Proof is defined as evidence that compels the mind to accept a statement as true. As learned in geometry as well as other math fields, proofs are used to show how a problem works as it does.
It exhibits the exact steps of getting from A to B. Proofs are difficult and uncertain at times as are
human relationships, exhibited in the Philip Lynch Theater’s production of David Auburn’s “Proof.”
“Proof” was a demonstration of following dreams and inspirations, even if the problems do not seem solvable at the moment, and the uncertainties of life.
The cast of four, including Kate Sisto (Catherine), Tyler Harpster (Robert), Kevin Kaucher (Hal) and Courtney Everett (Claire), showed their talents once again under the bright lights of the theater.
Sisto and Everett captured the tense relationship between two estranged sisters very well. From the awkward silences to the fits, the reality was apparent.
Although they played characters whose ages were beyond their own, they adapted well to the challenge and took the audience by storm through the enthusiasm in their roles.
Catherine is staring a looming possibility of insanity in the face, trying to do something great in adding to her father’s mathematical achievements. She does this through writing a proof that may change the way mathematics ARE viewed.
However, because her handwriting is similar to her father’s, the question of authorship arises. Was it really hers, or was her father really not as crazy as everyone thought him to be?
As Robert claims, “Crazy people don’t sit around wondering if they are nuts; they have better things to do!”
Drifting between one of the two flashbacks, the audience could get a little lost as to whether it was truly a flashback, or simply part of Catherine’s mental decline. She was, after all, seeing her father’s ghost in the present. Distinguishing his ghostly presence from the showing of a past event made the transitioning rocky for the unwary viewer
Set designer, Harold McCay, along with his set construction staff, did a good job of building the backyard of Catherine’s home, where everything took place.
The home showed wear in more places than others, making it look genuine. The show’s pieces of furniture, the upper story window and the grill all added to the homey scene, although they were never used.
Lighting designer, Andrew Nelsen, along with light board operator Melissa Chicola, did a great job in capturing the essence of Chicago weather, when it’s calm. The bright lights emphasized Chicago’s summer high points as well.
The darker lighting took down the temperature a few notches to emphasize the temperature change, making the season setting of the play truly genuine for all Chicagoans.
“Proof” is a story about human relationships and that developing trust and love can be difficult and uncertain, much like establishing the truth of a math proof.
The play, as well as the problem, is left open ended for others to step up and finish. “I know it works,” Sisto’s character explains during the play. “But all I see is compromises, places where it’s stitched together.”
The tale was both interesting in story line as well as fun to watch the reactions. Their story was both heartfelt and inspirational.
“Love, insanity and math. What else can one ask for?” said audience member, Casey McKenzie. The possibilities are endless, but one thing that is certain, is that “Proof” is a problem worth solving.
Lauren Pirc
News Editor | Click here for Lauren's Archives
PDF 
